Rahul Gandhi gets relief as Sultanpur court dismisses 2018 defamation case
Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has been acquitted by a special MP/MLA court in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, in a criminal defamation case filed in 2018 over his alleged remarks about then BJP president Amit Shah. The complaint was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra during the Karnataka Assembly election campaign. The court ruled in Gandhi’s favour on October 26, 2026, bringing relief to the Congress leader after years of legal proceedings.
Written by
Banashree Dutta

Rahul Gandhi Acquitted in 2018 Defamation Case
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi received significant legal relief on Monday, October 26, 2026, after a special MP/MLA court in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, acquitted him in a criminal defamation case dating back to 2018.
The case concerned remarks Gandhi allegedly made about Amit Shah, who was the BJP's national president at the time and is currently the Union Home Minister.
Gandhi appeared before the court for the pronouncement of the verdict. According to reports, the court found that the remarks were not defamatory in nature and acquitted the Congress leader. The decision brought an end to the trial at this stage.
What Was the Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi About?
The case originated during the 2018 Karnataka Assembly election campaign.
At a press conference in Bengaluru, Gandhi allegedly referred to Amit Shah as an accused in a murder case while criticising the BJP's claims about honesty and clean politics.
The remark related to the Sohrabuddin Sheikh encounter case, in which Shah had been discharged by a special CBI court in 2014.
BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed a criminal defamation complaint on August 4, 2018, alleging that Gandhi's comments were objectionable and had hurt his sentiments as a BJP worker. The allegations were the basis of the complaint and were not, by themselves, proof of criminal defamation.
Who Filed the Complaint?
The complaint was filed by Vijay Mishra, a BJP leader who had served as the district party's vice-president and was associated with the Sultanpur District Cooperative Bank.
Mishra approached the court after learning about Gandhi's alleged remarks through television news reports and social media.
The case proceeded through several stages before the special MP/MLA court, with Gandhi eventually being summoned to face trial in November 2023.
How the Case Progressed Over the Years
The case remained pending for several years, with multiple hearings and legal applications.
Key developments included:
May 2018: Gandhi allegedly made the remarks during the Karnataka Assembly election campaign.
August 4, 2018: BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed the defamation complaint.
November 27, 2023: The court summoned Gandhi to face trial.
February 2024: Gandhi appeared before the court and secured bail.
2026: The proceedings continued, including disputes over a request to obtain and compare Gandhi's voice sample.
October 26, 2026: The Sultanpur court pronounced its verdict and acquitted Gandhi.
Court Rejects the Defamation Allegation
The central issue was whether Gandhi's alleged remarks constituted criminal defamation under the applicable law.
According to Bar and Bench, the court held that the remarks were not defamatory in nature. Gandhi was acquitted in the case under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with criminal defamation and its punishment.
The decision represents the court's determination in this particular complaint. It should not be confused with other legal proceedings involving Gandhi, which are separate cases based on different allegations and facts.
Rahul Gandhi Had Denied the Charges
During the proceedings, Gandhi denied the allegations and described the complaint as politically motivated, according to earlier reporting.
His legal team contested the complainant's claims and opposed applications seeking additional forensic examination of the alleged audio recording.
The court's final decision brought relief to Gandhi in this case after years of proceedings.
Political Significance of the Verdict
The acquittal comes amid continuing political exchanges between the Congress and the BJP.
For the Congress, the decision is a legal victory for its senior leader, who is also the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha. The case had remained a point of political discussion because it involved comments directed at Amit Shah during an election campaign.
However, the court's decision should be understood in the context of the specific defamation complaint rather than as a ruling on the broader political dispute between the two parties.
What Happens Next?
The immediate outcome is that Rahul Gandhi has been acquitted in the 2018 criminal defamation case by the Sultanpur court.
Any further legal developments would depend on the applicable procedures and whether a challenge is pursued by the complainant. The available reports do not establish whether any further appeal has been filed following the verdict.
The ruling concludes the trial at this stage, but any subsequent legal action would have to be assessed separately.
Key Takeaways
Rahul Gandhi was acquitted by a special MP/MLA court in Sultanpur on October 26, 2026.
The case concerned alleged remarks about Amit Shah during the 2018 Karnataka Assembly election campaign.
BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed the criminal defamation complaint on August 4, 2018.
Gandhi was summoned to face trial in November 2023 and secured bail after appearing before the court in February 2024.
The court reportedly held that the remarks were not defamatory in nature.
The case involved provisions of the Indian Penal Code dealing with criminal defamation.
The verdict provides legal relief to Gandhi in this particular case; other legal proceedings, if any, remain separate.
Bottom Line
The Sultanpur court's acquittal gives Rahul Gandhi relief in a criminal defamation case that had been pending since 2018. The complaint arose from his alleged remarks about Amit Shah during the Karnataka election campaign.
The court reportedly found that the remarks did not constitute defamation, bringing the trial to a close at this stage. Any further legal developments will depend on the applicable process and whether the complainant challenges the decision.
Keep reading
More in Politics

Politics
Dhanteras Gold Rush Stretches Quick-Commerce Delivery Fleets and Dark Stores Across India
Quick-commerce platforms such as Blinkit, Swiggy Instamart and Zepto faced operational pressure on Dhanteras 2026 as consumers rushed to ord…

Politics
KTR, Jagan and Vijay Share Stage: Three States, 81 Seats and the Changing Southern Political Arithmetic
The coming together of KTR, YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and actor-politician Vijay on a shared platform has drawn attention to the political possib…

Politics
BJP's Rajeev Chandrasekhar Criticises LoP Over Alleged Contradictory Political Positions in Delhi and Kerala
BJP leader Rajeev Chandrasekhar has criticised the Leader of the Opposition (LoP), accusing him of taking contradictory political positions…

Politics
Assam Opens Online Registration for Bhupen Hazarika Centenary Finale in Delhi
The Assam government has opened online registration for the grand finale of the centenary celebrations of legendary singer, composer and cul…

Politics
Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Resigns from Lok Sabha and National Conference Amid Party Differences
Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi has reportedly resigned from the Lok Sabha and the Jammu and Kashmir-based National Conference amid disagreements wi…

Politics
Supreme Court Issues Notice to Kerala Congress Office-Bearers Over Social Media Post Targeting CJI Surya Kant
The Supreme Court has issued notices to all office-bearers of the Kerala unit of the Congress over a social media post allegedly targeting C…
