HC Frees Ghaziabad Woman From Father's Custody to Join Muslim Husband
The Allahabad High Court has allowed 26-year-old Ghaziabad woman Sonika Chauhan to leave her father's custody and live with her Muslim husband, Akbar Khan. The court said an adult has the fundamental right to choose a life partner and that such a personal decision cannot be controlled by parents or other family members.
Written by
Jyoti Mukherjee
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has allowed a 26-year-old woman from Ghaziabad to leave her father's custody and live with her Muslim husband, holding that an adult has the fundamental right to choose a life partner and live according to her own wishes.
Justice Sandeep Jain passed the order on a habeas corpus petition concerning Sonika Chauhan, who was produced before the court on Tuesday in compliance with an earlier order. During her interaction with the court, Chauhan said she had married Akbar Khan and wanted to live with him.
Woman says father confined her
According to court proceedings reported by Hindustan Times and NDTV, Chauhan told the court that she had married Khan voluntarily and alleged that her father had confined her at home because he disapproved of the marriage.
Khan also appeared before the court and expressed his willingness to live with Chauhan.
Her father, Lakshman Singh Chauhan, disputed the allegations. He told the court that his daughter had been blackmailed by Khan and was acting under his pressure. These allegations were part of the proceedings and were not established as findings against either party.
Court emphasises an adult's right to choose
After interacting with the woman and the other parties, the High Court held that a person who has attained majority has the fundamental right to choose a life partner and live according to their own wishes.
The court said such a choice is personal to the individual and cannot be dictated or controlled by the wishes of parents or other family members.
The court accordingly allowed Chauhan to live with Khan and directed the authorities to provide adequate security to the couple.
Family directed not to interfere
The High Court also directed Chauhan's family members not to interfere in the couple's matrimonial life.
The police were instructed to ensure their safety and provide necessary assistance. The order followed a habeas corpus petition filed by Khan in September 2025 in connection with his wife's alleged confinement.
Background of the case
The case dates back to 2025, when Khan approached the High Court after Chauhan was taken to her parental home following a complaint by her father.
According to Scroll's report on the proceedings, Chauhan had stated that she married Khan in 2022 under the Special Marriage Act and wanted to live with him. Her father had opposed the relationship and alleged that Khan had abducted or influenced his daughter.
Khan was subsequently subjected to police action, including an order under the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act requiring him to leave the district for a period, according to the report.
During the High Court proceedings, however, the court found no indication on record that Chauhan was acting under coercion, undue influence or intimidation.
Habeas corpus petition brought the issue before HC
A habeas corpus petition is a legal remedy through which a court examines whether a person is being unlawfully detained or confined.
In this case, the High Court interacted directly with Chauhan before determining where she wished to live. Her statement before the court was therefore central to the decision allowing her to join Khan.
Court's order and what happens next
The High Court's order allows Chauhan to live with her husband at a place of her choice and directs authorities to ensure the couple's safety.
The ruling does not decide the broader allegations made by either side beyond the issue before the court. It instead addresses the liberty of an adult woman to make her own decision regarding her residence and life partner.
The case has once again brought attention to the constitutional protection of personal liberty and individual choice in disputes involving adult couples and family opposition.
Keep reading
More in National

National
New Delhi Railway Station Introduces Separate Entry and Exit Gates for Reserved and Unreserved Passengers
New Delhi Railway Station has introduced separate entry and exit arrangements for passengers with reserved and unreserved tickets to manage…

National
Indian Railways Announces 106 Bihar-Bound Special Trains for Diwali and Chhath Puja Rush, Including Vande Bharat
Indian Railways is operating 106 special train services, including Vande Bharat trains, to manage the festive-season rush to Bihar during Di…

National
Vande Bharat Trains Record High Occupancy in FY26; Thiruvananthapuram–Mangaluru Service Leads at 189.35%
Vande Bharat trains recorded strong passenger demand in FY 2025–26, with Chair Car services achieving an overall occupancy rate of 99.10%. T…

National
Government Officials Allegedly Received ‘Protection Money’: Why CBI Sought Custody of Mahadev App Promoter Saurabh Chandrakar
The CBI has secured eight days of custody of Mahadev betting app promoter Saurabh Chandrakar to identify Chhattisgarh officials and influent…

National
Uttarakhand Trekking Tragedy: Two More Bodies Recovered, Death Toll Rises to Six; Two Still Missing
The bodies of two more trekkers who went missing following an avalanche on the Kedartal trekking route in Uttarakhand's Uttarkashi district…

National
Manipur: Three Kuki-Zo Men Killed in Gunfight with Unidentified Armed Miscreants
Three Kuki-Zo men were killed in an exchange of fire with unidentified armed miscreants at Kekru Naga village in Manipur's Noney district on…
