Kiren Rijiju Accuses Opposition of Politicising Anti-Paper Leak Bill
Kiren Rijiju alleged that Opposition parties politicised the proposed Anti-Paper Leak Bill instead of engaging in a constructive discussion on its provisions. The Opposition, meanwhile, has maintained that it supports stronger action against paper leaks but sought greater scrutiny of the legislation and accountability over alleged examination irregularities.
Written by
Jyoti Mukherjee
Rijiju Criticises Opposition
Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju accused Opposition parties of turning the Anti-Paper Leak Bill into a political issue during parliamentary proceedings.
He said the government had introduced the legislation to protect students and strengthen the integrity of public examinations, but alleged that the Opposition chose confrontation over substantive debate.
These remarks reflect Kiren Rijiju's position.
Government's Position
According to the government, the proposed legislation aims to:
Introduce stricter punishment for examination paper leaks.
Deter organised examination fraud.
Protect students and ensure fair examinations.
Enable faster legal action against offenders.
The government has also maintained that it was prepared to discuss the Bill in Parliament.
These statements represent the government's position.
Opposition's Stand
Opposition parties have stated that they support stronger measures against paper leaks but argued that:
The Bill should undergo detailed parliamentary scrutiny.
The government must also address accountability for recent examination controversies.
Legislative reforms should be accompanied by effective implementation and transparency.
These remarks represent the Opposition's position.
Political Context
The Anti-Paper Leak Bill has been one of the most debated pieces of legislation during the Monsoon Session, with repeated confrontations between the treasury benches and the Opposition over the alleged NEET paper leak and examination reforms.
Looking Ahead
The Bill is expected to undergo further parliamentary consideration. Debate is likely to continue over both its provisions and the broader issue of safeguarding the integrity of India's public examination system.
Keep reading
More in Politics

Politics
Student Suicide: Youth Congress Seeks Arrest of IIT Bombay Director and Prof Doolla, Demands Impartial Probe
Youth Congress national president Uday Bhanu Chib has demanded the arrest of IIT Bombay Director Shireesh Kedare and Professor Suryanarayana…

Politics
TMC MP Mahua Moitra Files Police Complaint Against CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Alleges Voter List Manipulation
Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra filed a police complaint against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar at Delhi's Parliament Street P…

Politics
Unmapped’, ‘Mismatched’: SIR Notices Leave Delhi Voters Seeking Clarity
More than 33 lakh Delhi voters have received notices during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls over issues such…

Politics
Opposition to Submit Notice in Parliament for Motion Seeking CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s Removal: Report
Opposition parties are preparing a fresh notice in both Houses of Parliament seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kuma…
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
‘Anti-incumbency does not exist in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or North Korea’: Rahul Gandhi asks why it ‘disappears’ for PM Modi and BJP
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi questioned why anti-incumbency, which he described as a recurring feature of Indian electoral politics, appeare…

Politics
NFO Alert: Tata Mutual Fund Launches Titanium Active Asset Allocator Long-Short Fund
Tata Mutual Fund has launched the Titanium Active Asset Allocator Long-Short Fund under its Titanium Specialised Investment Fund (SIF) platf…
