Twisha Sharma SC Hearing LIVE: CBI Likely to Take Over Death Probe

Supreme Court hearing turns intense as CBI takeover looms in Twisha Sharma case

New Delhi, May 28: The Supreme Court of India witnessed a tense and closely watched hearing on Wednesday in the ongoing case involving Twisha Sharma and accused Giribala Singh, with indications emerging that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) may soon take over the probe into the contested death case.

According to proceedings inside the courtroom, the bench examined allegations ranging from procedural lapses in the initial investigation to claims of non-cooperation by key parties. The matter, already under intense public scrutiny, escalated further after references were made to alleged character assassination attempts impacting the fairness of the trial process.

The court did not pass a final order during the hearing but is expected to deliver a crucial direction within the next 24 hours regarding the transfer of investigation to the CBI.

Background of the case

The case revolves around the suspicious circumstances surrounding the death linked to Twisha Sharma, which triggered an FIR and subsequent legal battle involving Giribala Singh as a central accused party.

Initially investigated by local law enforcement agencies, the case soon attracted controversy after conflicting statements emerged from witnesses and parties involved. Over time, allegations of pressure, inconsistency in evidence handling, and public narrative manipulation began surfacing, pushing the matter into the national legal spotlight.

Legal observers note that the matter gained further complexity after petitions were filed seeking a fair and independent probe, citing concerns over impartiality in the ongoing investigation.

Key courtroom developments

During the hearing, senior counsel representing both sides presented sharply contrasting arguments. One side emphasized procedural irregularities and alleged attempts to distort the personal image of individuals involved, while the opposing side pushed back, arguing that the investigation had been deliberately stalled through lack of cooperation.

A senior legal source familiar with the proceedings said that the bench appeared particularly concerned about whether the current investigative framework was sufficient to ensure justice.

“The court is examining whether the probe has reached a deadlock situation that requires external intervention,” the source noted.

The mention of potential CBI involvement significantly shifted the tone of the proceedings, with both sides asked to submit final clarifications before the next hearing window.

Allegations of character assassination and non-cooperation

One of the most contentious aspects of the hearing involved repeated references to alleged character assassination campaigns that, according to submissions, may have influenced public perception and legal strategy.

The defence reportedly argued that such narratives were affecting the fairness of the proceedings and creating undue pressure on individuals connected to the case.

On the other hand, the opposing side maintained that non-cooperation during investigation stages had weakened the fact-finding process and delayed critical forensic and testimonial analysis.

These conflicting claims have now become central to the court’s consideration of whether a central agency like the CBI should step in.

Possible CBI takeover: what it means

If the Supreme Court orders a CBI probe, the investigation will be transferred from state-level authorities to India’s premier central investigative agency, known for handling high-profile and politically sensitive cases.

A CBI takeover typically signals the court’s concern over impartiality, investigative delay, or procedural irregularities. It also resets the investigative chain, allowing for fresh interrogation, evidence review, and reconstruction of timelines.

Legal experts believe such a move could significantly alter the direction of the case.

“A CBI probe often changes the entire trajectory of a case because it brings a new investigative lens and broader jurisdictional authority,” said a senior criminal lawyer familiar with similar cases.

Public and political reactions

The case has triggered strong reactions in West Bengal, particularly in regions closely following developments through digital media and local news platforms like https://haldialive.com/en.

Supporters of judicial intervention argue that a central probe is necessary to restore public trust. Others caution against excessive media speculation influencing the legal process.

On social media, hashtags related to Twisha Sharma and Giribala Singh trended throughout the day, reflecting growing public curiosity and concern over the direction of the case.

What happens next

The Supreme Court is expected to issue its direction on the CBI probe within the next 24 hours. If approved, the agency is likely to begin preliminary review of existing case files immediately, followed by fresh rounds of questioning and evidence verification.

Until then, all eyes remain on the court’s final word, which could determine the future direction of one of the most closely followed legal cases in recent months.