White sheets, plainclothes cops: How Delhi Police ‘removed’ Sonam Wangchuk amid sea of protesters

Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk was shifted from his hunger strike venue in Delhi in a pre-dawn operation that has triggered political controversy, with supporters alleging that police used plainclothes officers and white sheets to move him away from a large crowd of protesters.

According to eyewitness accounts and media reports, the operation took place during the early hours as authorities sought to transfer Wangchuk for medical care after prolonged fasting raised serious concerns about his health.

Supporters claimed the activist was covered with white sheets while being escorted by personnel in civilian clothing to avoid attracting attention and prevent a confrontation with demonstrators gathered at the site.

Health concerns prompted action

Wangchuk had been on an indefinite hunger strike demanding action on environmental and constitutional issues. As his fast entered an advanced stage, medical experts reportedly advised that he required immediate medical supervision.

Authorities subsequently shifted him to a medical facility, maintaining that the move was undertaken to safeguard his health.

Delhi Police has maintained that actions taken during the operation were in accordance with legal procedures and were intended to ensure public safety and the well-being of the activist.

Protesters allege crackdown

The manner in which Wangchuk was removed has drawn criticism from protesters, who alleged that police detained several supporters, restricted access to the protest site and attempted to disperse the gathering.

Student organisations and civil society groups described the operation as heavy-handed, arguing that the right to peaceful protest should be respected.

Delhi Police has not publicly responded in detail to allegations regarding the use of plainclothes personnel or white sheets during the operation.

Political reactions intensify

The incident has prompted strong reactions from opposition leaders, several of whom accused the authorities of suppressing democratic dissent.

Supporters of Wangchuk have continued demonstrations despite his removal, with student leader Neha Bora and other activists carrying forward the hunger strike and demanding dialogue with the government.

The developments have further intensified the national debate over the handling of protests, civil liberties and the balance between maintaining public order and protecting the right to peaceful assembly.

What happens next?

Wangchuk remains under medical supervision as concerns over his health continue. Meanwhile, his supporters have vowed to continue the agitation until their demands are addressed.

With political attention growing and public scrutiny intensifying, the circumstances surrounding the activist's removal are likely to remain a key issue in the days ahead.