UPI MDR Decision Completely Professional, No External Pressure: FM Sitharaman
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has rejected allegations that the government's decision on UPI Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) was influenced by external pressure. She said the decision was taken through a professional process involving the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), payment banks and merchant banks, and stressed that MDR is not a tax that would generate revenue for the government.
Written by
Banashree Dutta

Sitharaman Defends UPI MDR Decision
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has said the decision on introducing Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) for specified UPI transactions was taken through a professional process and without external pressure.
Speaking to PTI, Sitharaman said the decision was taken jointly by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), payment banks and merchant banks, rather than being imposed by the government.
Her comments came amid political criticism and questions over the rationale behind the new UPI MDR framework.
'No External Pressure' in UPI MDR Decision
Sitharaman rejected allegations that the Centre had acted under pressure from foreign companies or other external interests.
She described the decision-making process as professional and said the government had not unilaterally imposed the MDR structure.
The Finance Minister also clarified that MDR should not be viewed as a government tax because the amount does not accrue to the government.
What Is UPI MDR?
Merchant Discount Rate, or MDR, is a fee associated with processing certain digital payments. Under the new framework, specified person-to-merchant (P2M) UPI transactions will attract MDR subject to applicable thresholds and exemptions.
The government has previously clarified that consumers will not face transaction charges for making UPI payments and that person-to-person transactions will remain free.
The latest framework therefore distinguishes between the cost associated with eligible merchant transactions and charges paid directly by UPI users.
Who Will Receive the MDR?
Sitharaman's clarification is significant because MDR is part of the payment ecosystem rather than a tax collected by the government.
The fee is associated with payment-processing participants such as banks and payment service providers. The Finance Minister said the government would not receive the MDR as tax revenue.
This distinction has become important amid concerns that UPI users could eventually face higher costs.
Will UPI Users Have to Pay More?
The government has maintained that consumers will not face transaction charges for making UPI payments.
A Finance Ministry statement issued earlier said UPI users would not be charged for transactions and that the vast majority of merchant transactions would also remain free under the framework.
Therefore, the introduction of MDR does not by itself mean that customers will automatically have to pay an additional fee every time they use UPI.
What About Mutual Fund and Other Financial Transactions?
The MDR framework is particularly relevant for certain financial-sector transactions, including capital-market and mutual-fund payments.
For investors, the distinction between recurring mandates and one-time payments remains important. The applicable MDR treatment depends on the transaction category and payment mechanism.
The broader objective is to establish a sustainable payment ecosystem while keeping ordinary consumer UPI payments free.
Why Is UPI MDR Being Introduced?
The government has previously described the proposed MDR mechanism as an enabling measure intended to support the long-term sustainability, technological advancement and resilience of UPI.
The government has also said the proposed charges would apply only to a limited category of merchant transactions above specified thresholds rather than to all UPI payments.
This means the new framework is not equivalent to imposing a universal fee on every UPI transaction.
Opposition Questions the Decision
The MDR decision has attracted political criticism, with Opposition leaders questioning whether external interests influenced the government's position.
Sitharaman rejected those allegations and maintained that the decision was taken through the payment ecosystem involving NPCI, payment banks and merchant banks.
Her comments represent the government's response to the political criticism; the allegations themselves remain claims made by political opponents.
UPI MDR: What Users Need to Know
For ordinary UPI users, the key distinction is between consumer charges and merchant-side MDR.
The government has stated that consumers will not be charged for making UPI payments. Person-to-person transactions will also remain free.
The MDR framework instead concerns specified merchant transactions and the payment-processing ecosystem.
Key Takeaways
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the UPI MDR decision was taken through a professional process.
She rejected allegations of external pressure.
The decision involved NPCI, payment banks and merchant banks.
Sitharaman said MDR is not a tax and will not generate tax revenue for the government.
Consumers are not supposed to face transaction charges for making UPI payments.
Person-to-person UPI transactions remain free.
MDR applies only to specified merchant transactions under the applicable framework.
The government says the changes are aimed partly at supporting the long-term sustainability and resilience of the UPI ecosystem.
Keep reading
More in Technology

Technology
Trump, US House Speaker and Tech CEOs to Meet on AI on September 29, Source S
US President Donald Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson and technology company CEOs are expected to meet on September 29 to discuss artificial…

Technology
Sarvam AI Updates Vision Model, Doubles Down on Indic-Language Push
Sarvam AI has launched Sarvam Vision 2.1, an upgraded vision-language model focused on document intelligence, structured extraction and Indi…

Technology
Brahma AI Targets Global Scale With $2 Billion Valuation, Silicon Valley Push
Brahma AI has raised $150 million in a funding round led by Multiples, giving the enterprise AI company a post-money valuation of $2 billion…

Technology
Better AI Won’t Fix Bad Company Data: Fuel Cycle’s Daryush Laqab
Fuel Cycle Chief Product and AI Officer Daryush Laqab has highlighted data quality as a major factor determining how effectively businesses…

Technology
Accel India, 360 ONE Group Sell Over 4% Stake in BlueStone for Rs 513 Crore
Venture capital firm Accel India and investment firm 360 ONE Group have sold a combined 4.07% stake in omnichannel jewellery retailer BlueSt…

Technology
Sarvam AI Updates Vision Model, Doubles Down on Indic-Language Push
Indian AI company Sarvam AI has launched Sarvam Vision 2.1, an upgraded vision-language model focused on document intelligence, structured d…
